Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2005 February 9

/ Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say:
[...]
| 7. xml:id.
[...]
| We had a successful CR telcon, and publication of the
| CR is scheduled for Feb 8th.

And it did occur!

Today ERH sent the following comment to the public xml-id list.
I'd like to discuss this issue tomorrow.

> I am now making this a formal comment
> to which I would request a response
> during disposition of comments:
> 
> Requirement 5 of" xml:id Requirements"
> states, "The solution must not
> inadvertently apply IDness to
> constructs which are intended not to
> have it."
> 
> Placing the id attribute in the XML
> namespace, has the effect of
> inadvertently applying IDness to
> constructs which are intended not to
> have it through the intermediary of
> canonicalization. I therefore believe
> that the current draft of xml:id does
> not meet its stated requirements, and
> request that the working group revise
> the draft so that this requirement is
> satisfied before issuing it as a
> recommendation.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.