- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:07:51 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
I don't expect to suggest any changes to the CR version, but I thought I'd pass this on to see if the WG members have any thoughts. paul -----Original Message----- From: public-xml-id-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Richard Ishida Sent: Wednesday, 02 February, 2005 2:06 To: public-xml-id@w3.org Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; 'Architecture Domain' Subject: xml:id Last Call comment from i18n . . . We note that the definition of the value of an xml:id attribute is defined only in terms of a valid NCName as defined by XML 1.0. The definition for NCName in XML 1.1 is different. We think this consitutes a major defect in the spec in its own right, but it also has significant internationalization implications for users of XML 1.1. Please specify that the valid value is different in the case of XML 1.0 and XML 1.1. For the I18N WG, ============ Richard Ishida W3C
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 15:08:00 UTC