Re: First cut at a W3C XML Schema for XLink

Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> writes:

> |> There are no elements in the XLink namespace. Maybe make
> |> simple, extended, title, etc. abstract?
> |
> | Or just remove the elt decls altogther, and change the type names to
> | 'simple', 'extended', etc.?
>
> I thought you were trying to describe the content model of extended
> links. For that, don't you need element decls?

Um, yes.  I responded too quickly.  We could get rid of 'simple' and
'extended', as they serve no purpose, but should keep 'title',
'resource', 'locator' and 'arc', but make them abstract, and maybe
include an example showing how to use substitution groups to exploit
all this. . .

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 16:19:04 UTC