RE: FW: XInclude test cases revised master list

Paul -- I also have a situation with the CVS where, I believe,  I will need 
help from a W3C CVS administrator. The  sub-directory "Harold" needs to be 
removed from the XInclude-Test-Suite directory. I created "Harold" and then 
attempted to add a sub-directory under it, I got a message saying that the 
sub-directory already exist in the CVS. When I checked the CVS no 
sub-directory was added.

I realized that the files sent to me had CVS entries from a different 
repository. I believe the CVS is getting confuse because of those previous 
CVS entries.  That directory needs to be clean up for me to recreate it 
again. I will also have to removed all the CVS entries from Harold's 
testsuite before committing or adding any directory. I was not expecting 
these entries.

Thank you,
Sandra



.At 01:57 PM 9/24/2004, Paul Grosso wrote:

>I would suspect so, but I don't really know for sure.
>Richard might.  But if you need a quick answer, sure,
>remove them.
>
>paul
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sandra Martinez [mailto:sandra.martinez@nist.gov]
> > Sent: Friday, 2004 September 24 08:45
> > To: Paul Grosso
> > Cc: XML Core WG
> > Subject: Re: FW: XInclude test cases revised master list
> >
> > Should I remove those .DS_Store files present in some of the
> > directories?
> >
> > Sandra
> >
> >
> >
> > At 11:56 AM 9/23/2004, Paul Grosso wrote:
> > >The attachment to this email is a zip of
> > >Elliotte Rusty Harold's XInclude tests.
> > >
> > >Sandra, can you please see about adding these
> > >to the XInclude Test Suite CVS?  Let us know
> > >if you run across any questions or problems.
> > >
> > >paul
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Elliotte Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, 2004 September 15 14:11
> > >To: Richard Tobin
> > >Cc: Paul Grosso; Henry Thompson
> > >Subject: Re: XInclude test cases revised master list
> > >
> > >
> > >Here's version 3 of my test cases. I've modified test 61 as we
> > >discussed. I also added one genuinely, syntactically bad
> > XPointer to a
> > >new test case so I'm now testing both that element(***) gets
> > treated as
> > >a resource error and that element(^^^) is a fatal error.
> > >
> > >I also think I have the UTF-8 BOMs removed from the files
> > you noted, but
> > >
> > >please check.
> > >
> > >And I corrected the couple of typos you found in the
> > description file.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Elliotte Rusty Harold
> > >elharo@metalab.unc.edu
> > >
> >
> > Sandra I. Martinez
> > National Institute of Standards and Technology
> > 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970,
> > Gaithersburg, Md. 20899
> >
> > (301) 975-3579
> > sandra.martinez@nist.gov
> >
> >

Sandra I. Martinez
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970,
Gaithersburg, Md. 20899

(301) 975-3579
sandra.martinez@nist.gov

Received on Friday, 24 September 2004 18:05:29 UTC