- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:12:52 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> > 24 and 25 are even worse than they look. They are negative tests, > which are supposed to produce errors. MT "passes" because it gets an > unrelated error (because it only handles a subset of the xpointer > scheme). They are supposed to fail because they produce documents > without any elements. Daniel, do you have any more info on whether your implementation is doing the right thing here? > > 48 and 49 are tests of infosets with unexpanded entities. > Only certain > non-validating parsers can produce these, and neither MT nor XOM does. > I don't know why libxml fails 48. Daniel, can you comment? paul
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:15:06 UTC