- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:41:04 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Wednesday, 24 November, 2004 11:00 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2004 November 24 > | 2. XForms WG Note on xml-stylesheet and XForms. > | > | See the draft Working Group Note at > | http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Group/Drafts/stylesheet-pi > | > | See the thread starting at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2004OctDec/0022 > | especially Norm's message at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2004OctDec/0030 > | > | See also JohnC's comments at: > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0037 > | where he argues it is reasonable to treat this as a stylesheet > | and raises the issue on how to recognize things via the MIME type. > | > | Arnaud would like to know more about the motivation and > | why they are using the xml-stylesheet PI instead of > | something else. > | > | Paul requested further info from the Forms WG: > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-forms/2004OctDec/0138 > | No response as of this Agenda writing; Paul just pinged again: > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-forms/2004OctDec/0172 > | > | Richard initially agreed with Norm's comment, but now he feels > | that what JohnC said makes some sense. > | > | We need to discuss more with at least Richard, Norm, JohnC on > | the call. > > HT: It has been escalated at the XML CG. Chris Lilley has an action > to raise this at the HTML WG. > > Revisit next week. I have received a response, archived in a member-only list at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-forms/2004OctDec/0194 On short, we are told the Forms WG has withdrawn the Note. Instead, I understand they will be submitting a Note that suggests a new "xml-edit" PI. See the referenced email for more. paul
Received on Monday, 29 November 2004 14:41:05 UTC