- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:13:41 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 November, 2004 11:01 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2004 November 17 > > 3. XLink erratum/update. > > > > Norm has suggested a possible update to XLink at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Nov/0033 > > where we say that an element that has an xlink:href but > > does not have an xlink:type should be treated as if it > > had a "simple" link type. > > Several of us have expressed support for this idea, > and no one objects. > > We believe we could make this change via the PER route. > ACTION to Paul: Raise this issue with the XML CG. I did, and one of the chairs replied: If you go forward with the PER [1] then you will have to show implementation experience for the proposed change: "Entrance criteria: The Director calls for review when satisfied that, with respect to changes to the document, the Working Group has fulfilled the same entrance criteria as for a Call for Review of a Proposed Recommendation (e.g., the Working Group can show implementation experience that supports the changes)." Is such evidence readily available? [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfr-edited Do we have any existing evidence and/or any WG members who plan to produce such evidence, say, by the beginning of 2005? I note that, lacking an actual CR request, we have no specific exit criteria, but it seems two implementations should suffice. paul
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 22:13:42 UTC