- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:46:07 -0500
- To: XML Core WG <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees --------- Paul Glenn Arnaud Jonathan Sandra Dmitry xx:25 Norm xx:10-xx:26,xx:31-xx:45 Leonid Richard Henry Daniel JohnC Lew until xx:30 [11 organizations (11 with proxies) present out of 12] Regrets ------- Norm (though he did call in from the airport for a while) François Lew (second half) Absent organizations -------------------- François Yergeau >1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current > task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections > ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. >2. Review of other working drafts. David Fallside requests[12] review > of SOAP MTOM, XOP, and SOAP Resource Representation Header. > >ACTION to Norm: Review the XMLP WDs. Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004AprJun/0185 ACTION to Norm: Reply to the XMLP WG. >3. Re-chartering. The Call for Participation is at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2004AprJun/0058 > >Current status is at http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/18796/status >where we have record of a response from: > Arbortext > Edinburgh > NIST > Sun > John Cowan > Daniel Veillard > Francois Yergeau > > Be sure your AC rep responds within the next week. > We plan to switch to the new mailing list on July 1. So noted. ACTION to Paul: Update the Group page to point to the new mailing list and any other minor appropriate changes. >4. XML errata. The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the > published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC > Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. > >PE125 hexadecimal character references in Note (editorial) >---------------------------------------------------------- >Seems like an obvious editorial correction to the chair. CONSENSUS to approve, into countdown. >PE126 Wrong link to #dt-extent (editorial) >------------------------------------------ >Seems like an obvious editorial correction to the chair. CONSENSUS to approve, into countdown. >PE127 1.0 example in 1.1 (editorial) >------------------------------------ >The chair could go either way on this very editorial one. CONSENSUS to approve (changing to 1.1), into countdown. >PE128 Missing ] in appendix I (editorial) >------------------------------------------ >Seems like an obvious editorial correction to the chair. CONSENSUS to approve, into countdown. PE129 Missing markup for "S" in some productions -------------------------------------------------- A number of productions do not correctly tag the "S" particle as being a production ([3]), hence it is not linked to the production. Productions [60], [62] and [63] are involved and may be more. CONSENSUS to approve, into countdown. ACTION to Francois: Update the PE document putting PE125-129 into countdown. ACTION to John: Sanity check PE125-129 before the countdown ends. >5. Namespaces in XML. > > ACTION to Richard: Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed. ACTION continued. >6. Xinclude CR was published April 13 at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xinclude-20040413 > >ACTION to Richard: Look into the xml:base attribute issue. Richard did: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004AprJun/0187 He says that the xml:base attributes were all wrong. By way of correction, he proposes we make the xml:base attributes relative. DV agrees. CONSENSUS to do as Richard has suggested. Richard made the changes in CVS as we spoke. ACTION to Sandra: Produce new tar/zip files and send them to Henry. ACTION to Henry: Update the test suite cover page at http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/XInclude/ with the new files. >Paul has some questions about ID in XInclude (DV responded): >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004AprJun/0182 >Q: So what is the result if a document with an ID is included twice? Henry and Daniel says you get the same as if you had typed in a doc with two elements with the same ID. Richard corrects this to say that this isn't quite true in that there is a difference with IDREFS in the result of inclusion. After inclusion, idrefs continue to point to (copies of) the same elements the idref pointed to before inclusion. We had more of a discussion here and decided we had a dangling reference problem that JohnC and others wanted to correct by adding wording to remove idref references that point to ids that are not in the resulting (post-inclusion) infoset. We have some reference fixup wording at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xinclude-20040413/#references-property but it needs slight modification to account for the fact that the references property is a list (at least, that's what the scribe thought was the issue). ACTION to Henry: Suggest corrected wording for the above referenced section. >The latest issues doc is at: >http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xinclude-cr-comments-3 > >ACTION to Jonathan: Reflect our decisions in the DoC and respond to commentors. ACTION continued, ongoing. >xi-12: xml:lang implementation report >------------------------------------- >Reject the comment, saying that inheritance is an important characteristic >of xinclude (not just with xml:lang), and we don't think we can remove >xml:lang at this time. >ACTION to Glenn: Respond to Eliotte on the comments list about this. ACTION continued. ACTION to Jonathan: Check that we are done with issues and are ready to exit CR. >7. xml:id. > >We should say that the values of xml:id must be >Names according to the XML version of the document. > >ACTION: xml:id editors to update the draft to allow XML 1.0 and XML > 1.1 Names as appropriate. > >Jonathan and/or Daniel will drive processing of remaining comments. Did not get to this topic. >[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core >[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks >[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2004AprJun/0179 >[7] http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html >[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata >[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata >[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2004AprJun/0058.html
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2004 16:03:52 UTC