- From: Sandra Martinez <sandra.martinez@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 17:21:45 -0400
- To: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: "XML Core WG" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Regrets. At 11:38 AM 8/2/2004, Paul Grosso wrote: >We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, August 4, >from > 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka > 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka > 15:00-16:00 UTC > 16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK > 17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe >on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. >We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . > >See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents >and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please >email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. > >Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and >completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it >at the beginning of the call. > >Norm, John sent regrets. > >Agenda >====== >1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current > task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections > ready by the beginning of the call). > > >2. Neither Norm nor Paul can make next week's telcon, and Henry is > on holidays. We may cancel the telcon of the 11th. > > >3. Problem with xml:space in the Schema document for the XML namespace > >Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org> sent us email on this at: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0019 > >Norm thinks Mimasa is correct; we should not provide a default for >xml:space. >Glenn agrees. Richard agrees. > >We should remove the default for xml:space from the schema. > >We have CONSENSUS that we should remove the default from xml:space, >but we'd like to wait until Henry is back to be sure. > >ACTION to Henry (when he returns): Comment and perhaps fix the schema. > > >4. XML errata. The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the > published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC > Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. > >PE 130 Missing paren in section 5.2 in XML 1.1 >---------------------------------------------- >Editorial. We should add the missing paren (was in 3rd Ed). > >CONSENSUS to do so. > >ACTION to Francois: Put into countdown until August 11. > >PE 131 Space or S in XML decl. >------------------------------ >Commentor says we use Space in the XML decl, but S elsewhere. > >Actually, XML decl is (correctly) using S, and S is just the same as in >XML 1.0. > >So the bug is that in SDDecl, it refers to x#20+ instead S: >http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml11-20040204/#NT-SDDecl > >We had CONSENSUS this was an editorial oversight, and that we should >change x#20+ to S in the SDDecl production. > >ACTION to Francois: Record the above resolution and put into countdown. > > >5. Namespaces in XML. > > ACTION to Richard: Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed. > > >6. Xinclude CR was published April 13 at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xinclude-20040413 > The updated test suite cover page is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/XInclude/ > >Sandra had sent email with what she thought were the needed corrections >at: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0022 >and she is waiting for confirmation or corrections on that. > >Richard and Glenn agree that Sandra should do as outlined in her email. > >ACTION to Sandra: Make the changes and commit to CVS. > >The PR-ready draft is at: >http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/07/PR-xinclude/ > >The public DoC (aka latest issues list) is at: >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/07/ExIT-xinclude/issues.html >At the top, this document says it's a DoC for the 3rd XInclude CR. >Are we really at the third CR, or just the second? > >Am I reading the DoC correctly to say that we have closed all issues? > >Are there any "closed" issues for which we have rebuttal we wish to >discuss? > >In the DoC, I don't understand "Ack" column of the table. What does >"review reply unaddressed" mean? > >I thought we got some push back from Elliotte that requires that we >indicate review non-acceptance of our resolution, but I don't see that >reflected in the DoC. > >At http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0025 >Richard had sent a format for submitting test reports and an XSLT >to convert the report to an HTML page. He also included his actual >results. > >We still need implementation feedback from Daniel and Elliotte (and any >others from who we can). > >ACTION to Richard: Send Elliotte an email on how to present his >results, >cc-ing Paul. > >ACTION to DV: Provide a table giving results (using Richard's files) of > >running the test suite on your implementation. > >ACTION to Paul: Write a PR request once we are ready to exit CR. > > >7. xml:id. > >We should say that the values of xml:id must be >Names according to the XML version of the document. > >ACTION: xml:id editors to update the draft to allow XML 1.0 and XML > 1.1 Names as appropriate. > >We need to get into processing xml:id comments and producing a new >draft. > >ACTION to Daniel: Work toward producing a new draft. > >Norm may have some cycles to work on this after mid-August. > >[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core >[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks >[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0034 >[7] >http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html >[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata >[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata >[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2004AprJun/0058.html Sandra I. Martinez National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899 (301) 975-3579 sandra.martinez@nist.gov
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 17:21:54 UTC