- From: Stephen D. Williams <sdw@lig.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:47:16 -0500
- To: bob@wyman.us
- Cc: 'David Ryan' <david@einet.com.au>, public-xml-binary@w3.org
After 20+ years, ASN.1 related software and standards haven't evolved and become available in ways that satisfy many current requirements or developers. There are many reasons for this. Could you point me to free, public specifications of those encoding format details and the ASN.1 schema definition semantics? sdw Bob Wyman wrote: >David Ryan wrote: > > >>I'd be interested if anyone is working on, or knows of >>binary formats with similar characteristics of binary XML >>but is not based on XML? >> >> > The encoding formats that have been defined for ASN.1 are the >"classic" binary formats that you would want to study. ASN.1, the "abstract >syntax notation 1", has been around for something like 20 years now and can >be used to define a wide variety of formats including text based formats >like XML as well as the binary formats BER, PER, DER, etc. ASN.1 is most >commonly known as the schema language for SNMP, X.500 Security Certificates, >etc. Also, ASN.1 is relied on heavily by the telecommunications industry. > In my opinion, the most logical thing for the W3C to do is accept >ASN.1 as an XML Schema language (it's use as one is defined by international >ISO standards) and to rely on the 20 years of development by the ASN.1 >community in developing and supporting binary formats. We don't need >yet-another-standard format and it is unlikely that any new effort is going >to be able to satisfy any larger community then the ASN.1 effort has been >able to address in 20 years of listening to and responding to requirements. > > bob wyman > > > -- swilliams@hpti.com http://www.hpti.com Per: sdw@lig.net http://sdw.st Stephen D. Williams 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax 20147-4622 AIM: sdw
Received on Monday, 29 November 2004 20:45:37 UTC