- From: Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 14:45:28 +0100
- To: <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Dear WG, Shane McCarron wrote: > We have historically > embedded the 'issues' into the draft. I think we should remove them > from the Note. There is no ongoing development, so things that were > 'contentious' or otherwise subject to later consideration are not ever > going to be considered. Many of those issues make the spec practically unimplementable interoperably, pending their resolution (the impact would be too great). I believe they should stay in the document. Publishing it would be totally futile with the assumption that it won't ever matter. Besides, http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Activity says: > a new home for the XHTML2 > specification is being sought outside of W3C It seems to contradict your last sentence. I know about talks with OASIS and foundation of future-web.org. You surely know more, Shane and WG members. Could you clarify, please? Best regards, Krzysztof Maczyński Invited Expert, HTML WG
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 13:46:16 UTC