- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 20:29:16 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Shane,
You state improperly that
[[
This appendix was removed from the recommendation. This clause in the
xhtml media types document was changed slightly, **but as far as we
know ids are permitted to contain colon characters even in XML
Namespace valid documents**. To answer your basic question, of course
XML Namespaces are required of XHTML 1.0 processors.
]]
Indeed in
It is clearly stated that Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) [1]
In 7 Conformance of Documents
[[
It follows that in a namespace-valid document:
* No attributes with a declared type of ID, IDREF(S), ENTITY(IES),
or NOTATION contain any colons.
]]
So please reconsider this answer
Regards,
Mohamed
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816/
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
> I have done a pass over the XHTML 1.0 Second Edition issues in the tracking
> system and made recommendations as to how to deal with them. Most of them
> are overcome by events as Appendix C has been removed from the
> specification.
> I have collected the issues together in a document at
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml1-issues-20090525.html - please spend
> some time looking at it.
>
> There are some additional issues that arose as the result of our PER
> submission. I feel like we should try to capture those issues in the system
> and address them before we restart PER. Any objections?
>
> --
> Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>
>
>
--
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 25 May 2009 18:29:56 UTC