- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 22:50:13 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Dear, I agree that it is misleading Furthermore we could have a prefix that is in UPPERCASE <HTML:html xmlns:HTML="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> ... </HTML:html> is perfectly valid So I agree it might be good to clarifiy this point Mohamed On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > As long as we are updating the PERs anyway... today someone cited section > 4.2 of XHTML 1.0 in a way that leads me to believe it *could* be > mis-interpreted. > > Section 4.2 reads: > > > 4.2. Element and attribute names must be in lower case > > XHTML documents must use lower case for all HTML element and attribute > names. This difference is necessary because XML is case-sensitive e.g. <li> > and <LI> are different tags. > > This is in an informative section, but still..... it seems to say that XHTML > requires all attributes and elements to be in lower case. Clearly what we > meant was that the elements and attributes from HTML 4 that we brought into > XHTML 1 are now only in lower case. Perhaps we should tighten this wording? > > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Sunday, 24 May 2009 20:50:53 UTC