- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:16:11 +0100
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, www-tag@w3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Steven Pemberton wrote: > ... > As I said, a CURIE is an appropriate value for a rel in HTML4. In HTML4 > the rel attribute takes CDATA, and is defined as a space-separated list > of link types, with no other definition of what a link type is. So a > ... I'm not sure how this helps. As a consumer of a @rel attribute, I need to know whether I need to process it as CURIE before comparing it with known link relation names. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 15:17:00 UTC