W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:39:16 +0200
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Message-Id: <14AA1126-1E60-48BE-BD5B-0F816540C2D5@iki.fi>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
On Feb 27, 2009, at 16:31, Karl Dubost wrote:

> The operational issue that henri is talking about in his message in  
> details is *only* about "xmlns:foo" constructs.

> And *NOT* about things like the value of an attribute:

Indeed. However, the remedy of errataing RDFa to use full URIs instead  
of CURIEs would address both that issue and the rel *value* issue Mark  
Nottingham raised. (Well, at least if the full URIs used as rel tokens  
do not have upper case letters A-Z.)

Henri Sivonen
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 14:40:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:40:04 UTC