public-xhtml2@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Saturday, 28 February 2009

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby

Friday, 27 February 2009

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Robert J Burns
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Shane McCarron
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Phil Archer
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton

Thursday, 26 February 2009

• Re: [Fwd: FYI: Link -04] Michael Hausenblas

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

• Minutes 25 February 2009 Steven Pemberton
• Re: Agenda points Mark Birbeck
• [Fwd: FYI: Link -04] Shane McCarron
• Agenda points Steven Pemberton
• Fwd: Transition Announcement: WAI-ARIA Last Call and WAI-ARIA User Agent Implementation Guide FPWD Steven Pemberton

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

• [XHTML] minutes: 2009-02-19 Weekly Telecon [draft] Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: Agenda 18 February 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Agenda 18 February 2009 Steven Pemberton

Friday, 13 February 2009

• Comments on XHTML Media Types Note - Second Edition Simon Pieters

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

• minutes: XHTML WG weekly telecon 2009-02-11 [draft] Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 Alessio Cartocci
• ARIA roles and XHTML Vocab revision Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: [XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 Shane McCarron
• Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 Mark Birbeck
• [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 Roland Merrick

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

• Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family Roland Merrick
• Fw: Regret, 18-02-2009 Roland Merrick
• Re: [XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD Roland Merrick

Monday, 9 February 2009

• Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family Markus Gylling

Friday, 6 February 2009

• Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family Shane McCarron
• Re: Any objections or concerns about styles for common spec features? Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Fwd: Any objections or concerns about styles for common spec features? Steven Pemberton

Thursday, 5 February 2009

• [XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD Gregory J. Rosmaita
• RE: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Steven Pemberton
• RE: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Phillips, Addison
• Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Steven Pemberton

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

• Minutes 4 february 2009 Steven Pemberton
• Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? Steven Pemberton
• Re: XHTML MIME Types note Steven Pemberton
• Minutes 28 January 2009 Steven Pemberton
• Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-04 Mark Birbeck
• 4th of Feb 2009 - no phone line. Tina Holmboe
• [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-04 Roland Merrick

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

• Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? Shane McCarron
• Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? fantasai
• Re: [XHTML Media Types - Second Edition] Japanese translation now available Coralie Mercier
• Fwd: [XMLEvents2] A scripting-only alternative to XBL2 Steven Pemberton

Monday, 2 February 2009

• RE: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? Richard Ishida

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:33:55 UTC