- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:29:09 -0800
- To: Gregory J.Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Cc: public-xhtml2@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
On Dec 9, 2009, at 08:43, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: > henri wrote, quote: >> Since the PFWG is chartered to work on accessibility matters, it >> seems inappropriate to publish a spec about non-accessibility >> uses of role through the PFWG. > unquote > > Role IS an "accessibility matter" -- whether role info is used by an > assistive technology or not... In your email that I replied to, you wrote: "but, the big picture is that there is a wide area of general applicability (i.e. non-accessibility uses) of the concepts defined and contained in the Role Module" Note in particular: "general applicability (i.e. non-accessibility uses)". > if not PFWG, then who, henri? Either no group or maybe a non-W3C group such as future-web.org. I thought the point of not renewing the XHTML2 WG charter was for the W3C to stop allocating resources to the XHTML2 WG deliverables. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2009 17:29:58 UTC