- From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:24:05 +0200
- To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:21:29 +0200, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com> wrote: > Sure...when viewed by that URL it's correct. > > But when viewed by the other URL it's incorrect. > > :) > > If we add a 'base' URL then it will be correct from any location, > including your local hard-drive. Good idea! You should have suggested that in your first email ;-) Steven > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Steven Pemberton > <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:03:34 +0200, Mark Birbeck >> <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> The only problem with the document is in the RDFa; by using constructs >>> like this: >>> >>> about="#alternate" >>> >>> it ends up defining this term: >>> >>> <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml-vocab-20090410.html#alternate> >>> >>> rather than this term: >>> >>> <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#alternate> >> >> But now it is in the right place, it does generate the right RDF: >> >> @prefix xhv: <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#> . >> >> xhv:alternate a rdf:Property ; >> rdfs:comment """alternate designates alternate >> versions for a resource."""^^xsd:string ; >> rdfs:member xhv:relrev-properties . >> >> Steven >> >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Steven Pemberton >>> <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>> Done. Looks good to me, but will you check that you can read it? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Steven >>>> (Catching up on backlog) >>>> >>>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:32:49 +0200, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have updated the vocab document finally- the update is at >>>>> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml-vocab-20090410.html - I don't >>>>> have >>>>> write >>>>> access to 1999/xhtml so could someone please put it in place? >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 13:24:50 UTC