- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:57:04 +0100
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 05:57:10 UTC
I am not sure issuing a PER a few weeks after having released the REC is really a good idea... it looks a bit funny to the outside world, it suggests that, well, we made a mistake. Is it so urgent? Ivan Steven Pemberton wrote: > > Hi TFers. > > Now that XHTML Modularization 1.1 is a rec, we have the opportunity to > reissue RDFa with an XML Schema attached. > > This would be as a PER, so the amount of process involved is minimal. > > We have an editor's draft already at > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20081018/ > > We are reissuing XHTML 1.1, Basic and Print before the end of the year, > but we may wish to wait a little before redoing RDFa, since it is so > new, but it would be worth talking about at a call. > > Best wishes, > > Steven > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 05:57:10 UTC