- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:52:35 -0600
- To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
(resent so it gets attached to ACTION) During Wednesday's meeting, we discussed various approaches to dealing with event naming in XML Events 2. I was asked to summarize this conversation. Here's what I think are the primary points and the direction we were heading: * DOM 3 Events is still in development, and it is risky to make XML Events 2 dependent upon it. * DOM 2 Events has all of the structures that we need for XML Events 2 - it just does not permit the use of QNames for event names. * It is possible to define XE2 such that the event name is a QName, and that the underlying implementation is tasked with magically mapping that into whatever the user agent supports. There are lots of good reasons to do this, but it still leaves us with a dependency on DOM 3 Events. There are also lots of good reasons to NOT do this. The most compelling of these (thanks Mark!) is that our audience is document authors, and they are not going to create namespace-qualified event names anyway. Spec authors are going to define qualified event names, and they need to deal with DOM 2 for the foreseeable future anyway. * The group seemed to be leaning toward changing the requirement back to DOM 2 Events, with a note that in the future we might extend this to encompass DOM 3 Events but that for now event names would remain unqualified. Feel free to comment or correct this summary... You can see the details of the discussion at http://www.w3.org/2008/11/19-xhtml-minutes.html -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 18:53:07 UTC