- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:47:28 +0200
- To: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org, "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>, "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:20:14 +0200, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Steven Pemberton wrote: > >> * Because of CSS's versioning mechanism, it is a Bad Thing if rules >> change meaning across versions > > Steven, that's the point : CSS has no versions... only levels. > I have said many times in the past that we now need to get rid > of levels to move to versions. > > </Daniel> I have no personal opinion about whether CSS should have levels or versions, and apologies if I caused confusion by using the word "version" instead of "level" in my email. I meant 'level' everywhere. However, the comments are purely in the light of the existing mechanism using levels. Best wishes, Steven
Received on Monday, 31 March 2008 12:48:12 UTC