- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:47:46 +0100
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Hi Shane, > However, if what we are trying to > do is ensure that when documents are written in XHTML Family markup > languages and are carefully constructed, then can be handed to HTML user > agents..... then we sort of need @lang back. > > I am soooo open for better suggestions... I think your suggestion is a very good one! :) I definitely don't have a problem with having a globally applicable attribute called @xml:lang that can be placed in arbitrary mark-up that is created on the fly, and for its meaning to be 'well known'. I think the same goes for @xml:space, @xhtml:role, and so on. But I don't see any need to insist on the use of these 'global attributes' in carefully crafted languages like XHTML, that will often be authored by hand, have very specific requirements, and in particular have a very definite set of processing rules. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.x-port.net | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com x-port.net Ltd. is registered in England and Wales, number 03730711 The registered office is at: 2nd Floor Titchfield House 69-85 Tabernacle Street London EC2A 4RR
Received on Sunday, 30 March 2008 20:48:22 UTC