W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > June 2008

Re: Reviewing Last Call RDFa

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:31:55 -0500
Message-ID: <485AEC6B.9060003@aptest.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>

Sure... and I have no problem with making those changes to the test 
cases.  However, note that neither change will result in ANY behavioral 
changes because neither of those things effect triple generation by a 
Conforming XHTML+RDFa Processor.  DOCTYPE is a convenience for people 
who want to validate XHTML+RDFa documents easily using our DTD, and 
@profile is a convenience for people who want to use GRDDL processors 
that don't process the XHTML namespace document correctly to extract 
triples from XHTML+RDFa documents.

No reason not to change the tests, but it won't make any difference as 
far as conformance goes. 

Ben Adida wrote:
> Manu Sporny wrote:
>> * Remove some of the DOCTYPE declarations at the top of some of the test
>> files, since this is a SHOULD in the RDFa Syntax document.
>> * Add @version to the HTML element in some of the test files.
> Let's do that after we go to CR, though it does sound like the right 
> direction.
> -Ben

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2008 23:33:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:40:02 UTC