- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:31:55 -0500
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Sure... and I have no problem with making those changes to the test cases. However, note that neither change will result in ANY behavioral changes because neither of those things effect triple generation by a Conforming XHTML+RDFa Processor. DOCTYPE is a convenience for people who want to validate XHTML+RDFa documents easily using our DTD, and @profile is a convenience for people who want to use GRDDL processors that don't process the XHTML namespace document correctly to extract triples from XHTML+RDFa documents. No reason not to change the tests, but it won't make any difference as far as conformance goes. Ben Adida wrote: > > Manu Sporny wrote: >> * Remove some of the DOCTYPE declarations at the top of some of the test >> files, since this is a SHOULD in the RDFa Syntax document. >> * Add @version to the HTML element in some of the test files. > > Let's do that after we go to CR, though it does sound like the right > direction. > > -Ben -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2008 23:33:08 UTC