- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:56:13 -0500
- To: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
- CC: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, public-xhtml2-request@w3.org
Roland Merrick wrote: > > Greetings Shane, I think that we are moving in the direction of a > consensus on having both handler and script elements and that the > script element should be backwards-compatible. This implies that the > script element should have an @type attribute. That makes sense to me. > > > If the script element has @type, I would expect handler to also have > @type. I also wonder why we cannot use @type rather than @srctype in > XHTML 2. Well - because it is inconsistent with @hreftype... we allow two methods of connecting to external resources, and those methods need attributes that support them. @hreflang, @srclang... etc. I don't really mind if we change @srctype back to @type in XHTML 2 - but you would need to get buy in from the whole group. > > Regards, Roland > > > > From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> > To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org> > Date: 21/07/2008 02:49 > Subject: XML Events 2 Scripting Module in XHTML 2 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > While editing XHTML 2 tonight, attempting to make all of the external > references hang together, I noticed something that I don't know the > solution for: > > If we are integrating XML Scripting into the XHTML namespace (as we have > planned to do) then the script element will bring with it the attributes > "encoding", "implements", "src", and "type". Naturally, we also want > the "script" element to take the Common attributes, which perforce > include the Metainformation attributes (RDFa), the embedding attributes > from XHTML 2, etc... Now @src and @encoding from the Embedding module > are probably consistent with what we meant for the script element. So > that's fine. I think. Correct me if I am wrong. > > @implements is a new thing, and there is no conflict. > > @type... XML Events 2 goes to great pains to explain what @type > means.... and I think it is exactly what is meant by @srctype in XHTML > 2. So... I am not sure what to do here. We can change @type to > @srctype in XML Events 2. We can bring in @type on the script element, > also bring in @src, and just have the script element reference the > Common attributes collection (use a subset that makes sense, but does > not include the embedding attributes).... or maybe something else. > > Help? > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > / > / > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU/ > > > > > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 14:58:07 UTC