- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:27:41 -0600
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Steven Pemberton wrote: > > As I edited the minutes of the call, I noticed Shane's remark on IRC > for the first time: > > "ShaneM: Note that the RDFa spec does not say that something with a > property of dc:title is the same as / overrides the title element." > > That is absolutely true. But the XHTML2 spec says: > > "The title of a document is metadata about the document, and so a > title like <title>About W3C</title> is equivalent to <meta about="" > property="title">About W3C</meta>." > > So we say that the title element is semantically equivalent to the > html:title property (and I hope we say the same about the title > attribute somewhere, I need to check; no we don't, needs to be added). We do not, and have never, said that the title attribute is semantically equivalent to the title element. And I don't think that it is. @title refers to a title for a given element and its contents. a @title on the body element *might* be construed as the title for the document, but would be counter to the I18N concerns we are trying to address in XHTML 2. > > For this reason, I would also like to propose that we remove the > requirement that there MUST be a title element in every <head>. I think I would object to that - it would mean that incremental rendering would become impossible. At the very least a user agent needs to discover the title of a document quickly so it can put SOMETHING on the window while it is processing and rendering. If we do not require the title element, then a document would need to be completely parsed and processed before the primary title could be discovered. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 16:28:11 UTC