- From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:01:52 +0000
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, public-xhtml2-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF8DF6F9AD.2A6C5F1E-ON80257393.005CBACF-80257393.005D8E63@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings Shane, I'd suggest that 1) and 3) need to be combined leaving two alternatives: 1) Get someone who knows what they are doing to design new styles for our assertions and document the convention in the overview of each spec so people know what we are trying to accomplish., or 2) Remove the styles altogether since they do not currently add any value. I have been doing some work with people in WS-I and EIC on documenting assertions in such a way that they are not only readable but can be extracted from the specification for machine processing. Regards, Roland Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> Sent by: public-xhtml2-request@w3.org 14/11/2007 16:26 To XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org> cc Subject Marking up assertions in our documents Some time ago, we adopted a convention of marking up assertions so they could be readily identified. When we did that, I (stupidly) introduced some css styles to highlight the assertions. I purposely made these styles obnoxious so that someone would complain and fix them. I also neglected to ever explain the convention anywhere. Then I forgot all about it. Roland has pointed out to me that our documents have obnoxious orange highlights in them, which he thought were diff marks. Nope - assertions. Not defined nor described anywhere. I propose we do one of the following: 1) Get someone who knows what they are doing to design new styles for our assertions, or 2) Remove the styles altogether since they do not currently add any value, or 3) Document the convention in the overview of each spec so people know what we are trying to accomplish. See, for example, http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml-access-20071030/ -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2007 17:02:44 UTC