doing the math (was: the "only" name for the xml serialisation of html5) from Gregory J. Rosmaita on 2007-11-09 (public-xhtml2@w3.org from November 2007)

From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:00:03 +0000
To: public-xhtml2@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <20071109135758.M28996@hicom.net>

i don't know why it seems so glaringly apparent to me that:

since HTML4 did not become XHTML4, but, rather, XHTML 1.0, HTML5 should 
not become XHTML5, but, rather, XHTML 1.5

if there should be an HTML6, it would be XHTML 1.6

just my (continuously devaluing) 2 cents, american,
gregory
--------------------------------------------------------------
You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of
focus.                                           -- Mark Twain
--------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus@hicom.net
   Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/
          Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus
--------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 9 November 2007 14:00:48 UTC