- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:16:19 -0500
- To: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- CC: public-xhtml2@w3.org
Laurens Holst wrote: > Personally I am fine with XHTML2 and XHTML5 both keeping their names; > after all, IPv5 was also something quite different from IPv6. > Nevertheless, if a name change is needed to avoid confusion, I think > it should rather be XHTML2 that would have to change its name, being > the specification that diverges from XHTML 1 quite significantly, it > is largely incompatible, and even using a different namespace. Just to clarify; we do not believe that XHTML2 is terribly different from XHTML 1.1. And it does not use a different namespace. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 16:19:34 UTC