- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:52:09 -0500
- To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
In doing our work with the RDFa folks, we discovered that M12N does not mention, and therefore does not permit, xml:base anywhere. If you attempt to set base on an element using xml:base, the validator will mark that as invalid. The question is: should we permit xml:base on M12N 1.0-based markup languages? Or should we incorporate it into M12N 1.1? I can't begin to explore all the issues with this here. The most basic one would be that xml:base is likely not supported in quite a few places where people want to use XHTML 1.1 documents (for example). Another might be that we would need to explicitly define what happens with the base element and xml:base collide. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 12:57:51 UTC