- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:27:30 +0000
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Hi Shane, I'm not sure that 'transformation' is a good choice of value, though. When the value is used with GRDDL it is accompanied by a specfic @profile value, so you could say that the word 'transformation' is in the GRDDL namespace. But if we were to put the value into the XHTML 'namespace', all we'd be saying is 'transformation', and since the XSLT PI already does that it might get confusing. Perhaps it should be 'grddltransform' or something that? Maybe Dan and other GRDDLers have a better suggestion? Regards, Mark On 11/12/2007, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > We have a list of reserved values for @rel and @rev defined in [1] and > [2]. I would like to extend these values to include the > "transformation" value that is defined in GRDDL [3], since the GRDDL > folks have told the world that is the right way to specify a > transformation for an XHTML document. Any objections? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20071018/#sec_9.2.6. > [2] > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml2-20071024/mod-metaAttributes.html#col_Metainformation > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-grddl-20070911/#grddl-xhtml > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > > > -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 22:27:39 UTC