- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:36:10 -0400
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5091537A.4030802@openlinksw.com>
On 10/31/12 12:24 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote: > > WebID Protocol Requirements: > > subjectAltName ... MUST be an HTTP URI and SHOULD contain a > #fragment ... > > > Adding a constraint on #fragment here doesn't make sense to me, people > and implementers are free to mint their WebID the way they want, let > them use 303 redirect if they like it. I know people who don't have a > #fragment in their WebID. This should be an implementation detail, not > a requirement. > > Steph. +1 That's inline with URI opacity principle [1]. Links: 1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#opaque -- URI opacity . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 16:36:37 UTC