Re: [foaf-protocols] [foaf-dev] WebID support for Node.js

And I forgot, I may consider redoing it with CoffeeScript (
http://coffeescript.org/) because it makes javascript classes a lot more
easy to use.

For end user it won't change a thing because coffeescript is compiled into
JavaScript which can be used both web and server side (node).

--
Baptiste Lafontaine
http://magnetik.org
+33 (0) 6 75 30 15 33



2012/10/6 Baptiste Lafontaine <baptiste33@gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> I didn't had a lot of time to work on it since I'm not a student, but I
> think it was quite usable.
>
> I would be glad to take a look on it tomorow. And maybe adding the RDF/XML
> parser.
>
> I also need to catch up with all the changes which may have been made on
> WebID !
>
> Feel free to contact me or fill in bugs on github if you need help about
> it.
>
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Baptiste Lafontaine
> http://magnetik.org
> +33 (0) 6 75 30 15 33
>
>
>
> 2012/10/4 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>
>>
>>
>> On 4 October 2012 14:11, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>wrote:
>>
>>> Excerpts from Baptiste Lafontaine's message of 2012-01-21 11:51:59 +0000:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > I'm one of the authors of this report. It's the report of our end of
>>> year
>>> > project. It's currently not finished but I hope that it will help some
>>> > people.
>>> >
>>> > With the work of Antonio Garrote, we made this WebID library:
>>> > https://github.com/magnetik/node-webid
>>> > It currently using a web service to translate RDF/XML to Turtle
>>> because of
>>> > the lack of good RDF/XML parser in JavaScript. I plan to change this
>>> after
>>> > the exam.
>>> > This module is published on npm:  http://search.npmjs.org/#/webid
>>> >
>>> > I've just comited some change. Any comments are welcome.
>>>
>>
>> Is this any help as an RDF parser?
>>
>> https://github.com/linkeddata/rdflib.js/blob/master/rdfparser.js
>>
>>
>>> Hi Baptiste,
>>>
>>> Have you done any further work on WebID + Node.js?
>>>
>>> I consider experimenting with variant of http://remotestorage.io using
>>> WebID instead of OAuth and would like to use Node.js for implementing a
>>> storage server.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > --
>>> > Baptiste Lafontaine
>>> > Etudiant Télécom SudParis
>>> > CV : http://magnetik.org/fr/curriculum-vitae/
>>> > Mobile : +33 (0) 6 75 30 15 33
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2012/1/21 Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
>>> >
>>> > > Use the community group forum for mainstream standardization. As
>>> Henry
>>> > > says, don't use it for webid applications though. Outreach beyond
>>> the very
>>> > > pure model (that any standard seeks to specify) should be done where
>>> its
>>> > > natural.
>>> > >
>>> > > If you want to do micro data and webid, dont do it in w3c webid for
>>> > > example. It's not welcomed (for standardization purposes). Do do it
>>> though,
>>> > > so the message spreads. Promote the literal standard too! The only
>>> thing
>>> > > that ultimately matters is: adoption.
>>> > >
>>> > > The mark of a good standard is folks still know its name, 30 years
>>> later.
>>> > > This means it has the kind of culture that means its fits lots of
>>> world
>>> > > views, not all of which may align 100%.
>>> > >
>>> > > Beware of certain w3c downsides, since like any forum it has limits.
>>> But
>>> > > at this early stage, it seems the right place to meet.
>>> > >
>>> > > Sent from my iPhone
>>> > >
>>> > > On Jan 20, 2012, at 5:56 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi Jonas,
>>> > > >
>>> > > >  thanks for the pointer.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Btw. we just started the W3C WebID Community Group now,
>>> > > > and it would be great if you joined :-)
>>> > > >
>>> > > >   http://www.w3.org/community/webid/
>>> > > >
>>> > > > W3C Community Groups should be easy to join, and are a way of
>>> ensuring
>>> > > > that for a minimal cost we don't end up with any weird patent
>>> issues. So
>>> > > > for everyone who would like  to keep up to date and contribute
>>> that is
>>> > > > where things are happening.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >    Henry
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 20 Jan 2012, at 14:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> Hi,
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> This looks like a serious effort to provide WebID support for
>>> Node.js:
>>> > > >> http://magnetik.github.com/node-webid-report/
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> - Jonas
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> --
>>> > > >> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>>> > > >> * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>>> > > >> _______________________________________________
>>> > > >> foaf-dev mailing list
>>> > > >> foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org
>>> > > >> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Social Web Architect
>>> > > > http://bblfish.net/
>>> > > >
>>> > > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > > foaf-protocols mailing list
>>> > > > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
>>> > > > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > foaf-protocols mailing list
>>> > > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
>>> > > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>>> > >
>>>
>>>
>>
>