- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:11:52 +0000
- To: Baptiste Lafontaine <baptiste33@gmail.com>
- Cc: WebID Community Group <public-webid@w3.org>, WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, Jonas <dr@jones.dk>
Excerpts from Baptiste Lafontaine's message of 2012-01-21 11:51:59 +0000: > Hello, > > I'm one of the authors of this report. It's the report of our end of year > project. It's currently not finished but I hope that it will help some > people. > > With the work of Antonio Garrote, we made this WebID library: > https://github.com/magnetik/node-webid > It currently using a web service to translate RDF/XML to Turtle because of > the lack of good RDF/XML parser in JavaScript. I plan to change this after > the exam. > This module is published on npm: http://search.npmjs.org/#/webid > > I've just comited some change. Any comments are welcome. Hi Baptiste, Have you done any further work on WebID + Node.js? I consider experimenting with variant of http://remotestorage.io using WebID instead of OAuth and would like to use Node.js for implementing a storage server. Cheers! > > Regards, > -- > Baptiste Lafontaine > Etudiant Télécom SudParis > CV : http://magnetik.org/fr/curriculum-vitae/ > Mobile : +33 (0) 6 75 30 15 33 > > > > 2012/1/21 Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com> > > > Use the community group forum for mainstream standardization. As Henry > > says, don't use it for webid applications though. Outreach beyond the very > > pure model (that any standard seeks to specify) should be done where its > > natural. > > > > If you want to do micro data and webid, dont do it in w3c webid for > > example. It's not welcomed (for standardization purposes). Do do it though, > > so the message spreads. Promote the literal standard too! The only thing > > that ultimately matters is: adoption. > > > > The mark of a good standard is folks still know its name, 30 years later. > > This means it has the kind of culture that means its fits lots of world > > views, not all of which may align 100%. > > > > Beware of certain w3c downsides, since like any forum it has limits. But > > at this early stage, it seems the right place to meet. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Jan 20, 2012, at 5:56 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Jonas, > > > > > > thanks for the pointer. > > > > > > Btw. we just started the W3C WebID Community Group now, > > > and it would be great if you joined :-) > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/community/webid/ > > > > > > W3C Community Groups should be easy to join, and are a way of ensuring > > > that for a minimal cost we don't end up with any weird patent issues. So > > > for everyone who would like to keep up to date and contribute that is > > > where things are happening. > > > > > > Henry > > > > > > > > > On 20 Jan 2012, at 14:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> This looks like a serious effort to provide WebID support for Node.js: > > >> http://magnetik.github.com/node-webid-report/ > > >> > > >> > > >> - Jonas > > >> > > >> -- > > >> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > > >> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > >> > > >> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> foaf-dev mailing list > > >> foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org > > >> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev > > > > > > Social Web Architect > > > http://bblfish.net/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > foaf-protocols mailing list > > > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org > > > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols > > _______________________________________________ > > foaf-protocols mailing list > > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org > > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols > >
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 12:12:20 UTC