- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:24:15 -0500
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50A587AF.9070306@openlinksw.com>
On 11/15/12 6:27 PM, Henry Story wrote: > The way to change the spec is to propose textual spec changes. Could those who wish > to support the #url simpliciations please put forward some clear text that the editors > can add to the spec, so that people can then vote on it. > > I think this does simplify the spec, and it does not break anything, since we had already > agreed to Turtle and RDFa being a MUST. > > Currently we have is: > > WebID: > > <blockquote src=" https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index-respec.html " > > A URI that refers to an Agent - Person, Robot, Group or other thing that can have Intentions. The WebID should be a URI which when dereferenced returns a representation whose description uniquely identifies the Agent who is the controller of a public key. In our example the WebID refers to Bob. A WebID is usually a URL with a #tag, as the meaning of such a URL is defined in the document refered to by the WebID URL without the #tag . > </blockquote> > > WebID Profile > > <blockquote src=" https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index-respec.html" > > A structured document asserting the relationship between the Subject (identified by his WebID) and his Public Keys using relationships as defined by the Resource Description Framework [RDF-CONCEPTS] and published at the URL location of the Subject's WebID. Dereferencing the WebID should return the Profile Page in one of a number of formats. The Server must publish the document in at least the RDFa [RDFA-CORE] serialization format or in Turtle [TURTLE-TR]. The document may be published in a number of other RDF serialization formats, such as RDF/XML [RDF-PRIMER], or N3 [N3]. Any other serializations that intend to be used by the WebID Protocol must be transformable automatically and in a standard manner to an RDF Graph, using technologies such as GRDDL [GRDDL-PRIMER]. > </blockquote> +1 > > > Proposal 1: with hash urls > =========================== > > > a) A WebID is a URI [1] whose scheme is either "http" or "https" and that contains a fragment identifier. > The WebID denotes an Agent ( Person, Organisation, Group, Software, ...). The URI without the hash denotes the WebID Profile. -1 > > b) A WebID Profile is a web resource that MUST by default return a TURTLE document, but that > can return other RDF serialisation formats if requested through content negotiation. The RDF > graph expressed by this turtle document MUST contain a number of relations containing the WebID > that uniquely identify the referent of the WebID. -1 > > Proposal 2: > ========== > > like proposal 1 but > > b) the WebID Profile MUST either return RDFa or Turtle > > > > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986 > > > > > > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > The current definition for which I gave a +1 is superior to the alternatives proposed. If I was to reword the current definition (for which I voted +1) I would say something along the lines of: A WebID is a URI that *denotes* an Agent - Person, Robot, Group or other thing that can have Intentions. When de-referenced (or looked up) this kind of URI returns a document that uniquely describes its referent -- the denoted Agent. In our example, a WebID *denotes* Bob, it takes the form of an HTTP URL with a #tag or fragment identifier, and returns an RDF document that describes Bob. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 00:24:40 UTC