W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Re: two mailing lists - is one too many

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:46:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+C-EEBndQkp-zk2x6wZ_tUST4W_v2psqmbQ7Zu85g1Mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>
Cc: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, public-webid@w3.org, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
On 23 January 2012 21:01, Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have two public mailing lists for the WebID Community Group.
> The XG mailing list has all those who subscribed to the XG mailing
> list + all the members of the WebID Community Group, while the
> public-webid mailing list only has the WebID members and those who
> joined and subscribed to that. The number of members are
> - 90 e-mail accounts for  public-xg-webid@w3.org
> - 26                 for  public-webid@w3.org
> I think it would be good to close one of them as otherwise discussions
> will end up be going in parallel in both groups, and so water down the
> conversation.
> So the ideal may be to move everyone on public-xg-webid to public-webid.
> But if that cannot be done without asking everybody to resubscribe,
> then I think it may be better to close the public-webid mailing list,
> and stick with the weird XG legacy.

Perhaps the CG mailing list should focus on the nitty gritty of the spec.

And more general discussions inc. WebID return foaf-protocols, and
apps in the readwrite web group.

The reason I suggest this is that there have been some comments about
the volume of mails on this list being a chalenge follow, so splitting
things up could allow a degree of focus.

>        Henry
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 11:58:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:55 UTC