- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:44:05 +0100
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>, "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 12 Jan 2012, at 18:48, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> Just a quick FYI while we crack on with Microformats and WebID effort via >> hCard. > > I had not seen that no. Thanks for the link. An inline cryptographic > digest URI format sounds like it presents interesting opportunities > for sharing this information. > > I've captured some of this in the hcard-brainstorming wiki page in the > hopes that if this group does figure out how hCard can/should be used > with the 'key' property, we can write that up as at least as > examples/suggestions in the hCard spec itself. > > http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-brainstorming#key_property_for_webid Perhaps it would help if you add a link to the existing spec there, so people can see the bigger picture. A short friendly URL is http://webid.info/spec > Feel free to update/edit details on that wiki page. As a matter of interest, since we have a bit of your time here, I had a few questions: - Is it possible for micro data and micro formats to co-exist easily in one page? I mean so that a parser can know not to mix up tags from one or the other. - Similar question with RDFa - I had heard that it was very difficult to find consistent parsers for microformats, that different parsers could end up giving different interpretations for the same markup. Are the semantics of micro formats consistently defined across web sites? How can one set up a test suite for this? Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 10:45:10 UTC