Re: My slightly comments

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote:

> On 10.01.2012 17:06, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:
>
>> Hi Domel,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl
>> <mailto:ddooss@wp.pl>> wrote:
>>
>>    My comments to the lastest version in repo [1]:
>>    1.3 Namespaces - in the table there is 'bob' which isn't use in
>>    spec. It can be removed.
>>
>>
>> yes, I removed some of the bob:me we were using before in the Turtle for
>> example. I also think adding the WebID profile as a namespace will
>> confuse people (the trend now is to do away with namespaces, or to at
>> least reduce them as much as possible). I haven't made that change yet
>> as I'd like to double check the spec on that again.
>>
> I've checked it, there is no example where it is used. But bob prefix is
> used in text:
> 1. "The bob: namespace is a URI that refers to Bob's profile, where Bob is
> an imaginary character well known in security circles." this statement
> isn't necessary.
> 2. "...and from there filter out all those that were the object of the
> cert:modulus relation of the WebID - in the example bob:me." This should be
> changed to "...and from there filter out all those that were the object of
> the cert:modulus relation of the WebID - in the example
> https://bob.example/profile#me**"
> 3. "Because one could not rely on the modulus having been normalized, one
> would have to start with the WebID - bob:me and...". The same situation, is
> should be changed to absolute URI.
>

I agree, I will replace bob:me with https://bob.example/profile#me in the
location 2 and 3, and remove 1.

Steph.


>
> Regards,
> Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
>