- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:35:17 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 10 Jan 2012, at 23:28, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 1/10/12 5:22 PM, Henry Story wrote: >> >> Ok. For the RESTfulness of the spec I have asked people on REST discuss to see if they can give us feedback. > Be careful with REST, we don't need the distraction of mercurial concept descriptions. > > Folks implementing WebID verifiers or generators simply need to know that they will be working with URIs and conduits to graphs via "data access by reference patterns". > > You've already covered the resources, representation, cache invalidation, content negotiation, names, and addresses as the apply to the WebID verification protocol. I encourage you not to open up a "what is REST" endless debate around WebID :-) Ok. But I'd like the REST fans to see that we are on their side, and do a bit of advertising for us. :-) I mean at some point doing the right thing should be rewarded, right? > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder& CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:35:50 UTC