Re: a remark on the webid spec

I have incorporated Mischa's suggested fixes

  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/rev/cb61c27205c0

As can be seen in the latest editor's draft

  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index-respec.html

Henry

On 14 Dec 2011, at 02:33, Mischa Tuffield wrote:

> 
> The three fragments of RDF could all be interpreted to be slightly different. 
> 
> 1. In the RDF/XML and the Turtle all of the foaf:Person IRIs are set explicitly to : https://bob.example/profile. But this is not the case in the RDFa, there is it dependant on the location of the html document. I would prefer all of them to be baseIRI dependant (like the RDFa). Regardless of the fixed adopted i think consistency is the way forward. 
> 
> You could either 
> 	a) change in the Turtle s;/bob:me/<#me>/ and from the bob @prefix 
> or
> 	b) change the RDFa to be s/"#me"/"https://bob.example/profile#me"/
> 
> b) is probably an easier fix, but a) seems neater. 
> 
> 2. In the RDFa the foaf:name "bob" inherits a language tag. I don't like language tagged names, they don't feel right. And plus there no language tag in the Turtle or the RDF/XML. 
> 
> You could add a xml:lang="" to the foaf:name span
> 
> 3. Turtle consists of 9 triples, rdf/xml of 8, and the rdfa has 7 triples. 
> 
> Missing triples are basically foaf:weblog from the rdf/xml, and foaf:weblog along with rdf:label
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 20:57:55 UTC