- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:10:04 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, "public-xg-webid@w3.org XG" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
> Consequently I'd recommend going with the migration to CG... Thanks for this, DanBri and +1 Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 5 Jan 2012, at 17:01, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 5 January 2012 17:45, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >> I asked if we could have an extension as an XG, but I think the >> answer was that we would be switched to a community group, which >> apparently is easy to do. But to tell the truth I did not find the >> answer I received very clear. > > Little things like asking people to resubscribe to a new mailing list > can be suprisingly disruptive. If we can keep the old mailing list, > that'd be great. > > I just asked about migration details in IRC (#community on W3C IRC > server): > > 17:51 danbri: can XGs migrating to Community Group keep their old > mailing list? > 17:53 danbri: ...also: what's the situation currently re Community > Group usage of Zakim? I remember we talked about this here > 17:57 Ian: hey > 17:57 Ian: yes > 17:57 Ian: (ml migration) > 17:57 Ian: regarding zakim: xgs get to continue to use zakim > 17:58 Ian: when they migrate > 17:59 danbri: thanks, I'll pass that along > > Consequently I'd recommend going with the migration to CG... > > cheers, > > Dan >
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 17:18:24 UTC