- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 01:37:29 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 5 Jan 2012, at 01:27, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 1/4/12 7:16 PM, Henry Story wrote: >> On 5 Jan 2012, at 01:09, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> >>>> But anyway, clearly you don't want to work on a common test suite to help new people join. >>> See my opening comments. It's been done before, many times over with standards much more complex than WebID, used by masses of people world wide. >> Ok. So are you against a webid test suite then? Yes/No > FWIW - No. Why? What would be the problem with having an OpenSource set of tests to help newcomers who produce new WebID Protocol endpoints to run a bunch of tests against it to find out if they are WebID compliant? Did we not in this thread use a whole bunch of tests suites/validators? For RDFa, for RDF/XML etc.... Were they not helpful? It would help if you explained your position more clearly because it could be that we have a misunderstanding between what you think I am talking about and what I think I am talking about. Henry > > > Kingsley >> If yes, how do you think we should proceed. >> If no, why do you think we should not have one? >> >> >> >>>> Perhaps WebID would be just too simple then.... >>> No comment :-) >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> >> > > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder& CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 01:36:23 UTC