W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2012

Testing WebIDs -- was: changing WebIDs

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:10:03 +0100
Cc: "public-xg-webid@w3.org XG" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
Message-Id: <645B8E69-7E2D-42F7-8584-B923D369F17B@bblfish.net>
To: Baptiste Lafontaine <baptiste33@gmail.com>

On 4 Jan 2012, at 19:00, Baptiste Lafontaine wrote:

> 2012/1/3 Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
>> On 1/3/12 12:51 PM, Peter Williams wrote:
>>> Im regularly in the position now that of my 15 use case that I test, almost all work at Bergi site (but various subsets work at kingsleys and then at Henrys site).  Its not becuase of technology differences or lack of support o=for this and that (I can elimiante those); its becuase they are applying QUITE different correctness rules (and not jus different validity logics)
>> Do you have a list of URIs that reflect the above re. verification? If possible, a table in a shared Google Doc (or something similar re. Web access) would be nice.
> I'm also interested in a simple way to  test my webid implementation.

Bergi put the following together. 

I am not sure if it has been updated to the latest ontology yet.

It is perhaps more complicated than needed. We were looking for feedback on this to know how to proceed. 
In Clerezza my foafssl.org endpoint used to produce the RDF that could be used in Bergi's tests. But as I rewrote a new WebID implementation for the third time I did not do that again. But it was really helpful for finding all kinds of bugs in implementations. 

So please help Bergi with feedback on this. I think this is a really useful conversation for us to have, because then we can work out what bugs are automatically, and reproduce them.


>> --
>> Regards,
>> Kingsley Idehen

Social Web Architect
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 18:10:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:54 UTC