W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > September 2011

Re: publishing earl vocabulary. What namespace?

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:44:53 +0200
Cc: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, "Michael G. Hausenblas" <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Message-Id: <3DDA43BF-4983-4CFA-B719-A1C9052D6135@bblfish.net>
To: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>

On 16 Sep 2011, at 00:43, bergi wrote:

>> So we need to change the namespace to a hash namespace.
>> we could have
>> </webid/test/earl#>
> +1
> There is already the spec folder. A folder called test fits better into
> this logic than an earl folder.
>> </webid/earl/wit#>
>> or something like that.
>> Perhaps we should even move it to some longer lasting namespace, so
>> we can continue working on this after the end of the XG? I am not
>> sure how to think of these longer term issues.
> We could split it. Everything that's related to the spec could be frozen
> after the end of the XG.

I just asked Coralie Mercier, and everything in that name space is frozen after then end of the XG. But I think we should have all the tests for our current spec working by then, hopefully way before so we can make improvements on the spec. In any case ontologies can be extended with other namespaces, so this is not such a problem.

> By definition the other tests should test features and the list of
> features could grow in the future.
> Do you have any suggestion where to store that earl file for the features?

> The test suite also needs a namespace. Where do you think I should
> publish this earl file? I could use my namespace vhost or do you want to
> store them on the same place?

Ah yes, so the test agent that test endpoints can also produce earl.

I think that means that 

>> </webid/test/earl#>

is not a good idea since both are earl files .

Better would be 

</2005/Incubator/webid/earl/server#> // for the initial earl suite I wrote and implemented
</2005/Incubator/webid/earl/client#> // for the earl suite that tests servers that spit out the above

But I have not given the names "server" and "client" much thought. I am sure we can do better.


Social Web Architect
Received on Friday, 16 September 2011 10:45:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:46 UTC