W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Interop and choice of languages was Re: comments to references

From: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:34:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4EAAAF5F.9060708@wp.pl>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
CC: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
On 28.10.2011 15:15, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
> "Most" is a funny term. Some are, some are not.
> (...)
> The advantage of turtle only is that it is actually what *most* people use,
> it doesn't need and XML parser, and it is upgradable to N3 if you need to later.
I agree that "most" not the best term, but you use the same term above 
when you're talking about Turtle vs. (RDF/)XML. :)

> (Are they not doing graph serializations?)
(They are doing also something like TriG/N-Quads)

> No, and not PEM.  This just increases the implementation load, code size, and the security surface exposed.
I am not a fanatic. :) Tim Berners-Lee convinced me. Back out of it.

Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 13:34:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:47 UTC