W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:fingerprint ?

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:15:48 +0200
Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
Message-Id: <A393B836-6FEF-49A5-9B65-D1C313947807@bblfish.net>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>

On 27 Oct 2011, at 12:57, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

> On 10/27/11 5:04 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:33:07 -0400
>> Kingsley Idehen<kidehen@openlinksw.com>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Since we have cert:key, what about cert:fingerprint?
>> Currently I'm just using rdfs:label for this purpose.
>> 
>> <#me>  cert:key [
>> 	rdfs:label "...." ;
>> 	cert:modulus "...." ;
>> 	...
>> 	] .
>> 
> 
> Cool!
> 
> Very neat non disruptive hack :-)

Kingsley if you put an unreadable string into a label which humans are meant to read, it will be disruptive. For your software furthermore that relies on lanes to build user interfaces.


> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> President&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 11:16:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:47 UTC