- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:53:29 -0400
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
- Message-ID: <4EA705A9.6010309@openlinksw.com>
On 10/25/11 12:38 PM, Henry Story wrote: > On 25 Oct 2011, at 18:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> Henry, >> >> Since we have cert:key, what about cert:fingerprint? > How would you define it? Good question since WOT [1] and these newer Key oriented ontologies aren't aligned. In addition, WOT is conflating public key and x.509 certificate. The fingerprint I am talking about is a hash (md4, md5, sha, sha256, sha512) of the entire x.509 Cert. If you put a Certificate's fingerprint in a data space (this could be a tweet even) you can still perform a match with the X.509 cert from a successful SSL/TLS handshake. Since we are preoccupied with this feature, we'll take on the task of making a tweak to existing ontologies (if possible). Then we'll just share what we have and leave it up to everyone else to decide what they do with it :) Links: 1. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Fwot%2F0.1%2F -- WOT as I currently see it re. Fingerprint conflation problem Kingsley > Henry > >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Kingsley Idehen >> President& CEO >> OpenLink Software >> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen >> >> >> >> >> >> > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:53:53 UTC