Re: [foaf-protocols] Final -- cert:key accepted

On 14 Oct 2011, at 19:56, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:

> (removing foaf-protocols from cc).
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 14 Oct 2011, at 15:38, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Oct 14, 2011 9:15 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok,
>> >
>> >    It looks like we have enough implementers and other who like cert:key . I'll replace the cert:public_key with it.
>> > When we have a few implementations we can then remove the "unstable" flags.
>> >
>> >    Does someone want to take on the task of rewriting the examples in the spec to use cert:key instead of cert:identity ?
>> 
>> I have a branch on github with the inverse cert:identity, just need to update to the new property name. I guess I could commit it right away to the main repo since we have reached consensus now...
>> 
> 
> yes good idea.
> You can also mark it as deprecated.
> 
> Are you editing the n3 file? that is the one that we base the others on, so we can diff it.
> 
> no, I only changed the spec whose source is in respec-html. Note that I only made the changes to my personal github until everyone is happy with the new draft of the spec, but I can merge it into the W3 repo any time when people are happy with the changes:
> https://github.com/scor/webid-spec/compare/master...cert-identity-rev

To me that looks good. Can you also publish that to the CVS repo? If you can that allows me to get along rebuilding the java libs for the new ontology.

I think you may also want to include Domel's changes: he added an rdf/xml version.

Henry

> 
> Steph.
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/