public-xg-webid@w3.org from November 2011 by date

Wednesday, 30 November 2011

• Re: test suite - does earl need a notion of a cause? Henry Story
• Re: test suite Henry Story
• RE: struggling with ASK Peter Williams
• RE: Securing the Next Generation of Web Apps - talk Peter Williams
• Re: TLS-Light Henry Story
• Re: TLS-Light Kingsley Idehen
• RE: TLS-Light Peter Williams
• Re: struggling with ASK Kingsley Idehen
• TLS-Light Henry Story
• Securing the Next Generation of Web Apps - talk Henry Story
• Re: struggling with ASK Dan Brickley
• Re: struggling with ASK Kingsley Idehen
• Re: struggling with ASK Kingsley Idehen
• Re: struggling with ASK Kingsley Idehen
• Re: struggling with ASK Martin Gaedke

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

• Re: test suite bergi
• xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments Henry Story
• Re: struggling with ASK Peter Williams
• Re: struggling with ASK Henry Story
• Re: struggling with ASK Henry Story
• RE: struggling with ASK Peter Williams
• Re: struggling with ASK Kingsley Idehen
• Re: struggling with ASK Henry Story
• Re: excellent diagram in spec Henry Story
• Re: excellent diagram in spec Henry Story
• Re: struggling with ASK Kingsley Idehen
• Re: excellent diagram in spec Dan Brickley
• excellent diagram in spec Peter Williams
• RE: struggling with ASK Peter Williams
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: struggling with ASK Henry Story
• Re: struggling with ASK Henry Story
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] Stéphane Corlosquet
• RE: struggling with ASK Peter Williams
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Fediz IDP proposed for incubation at Apache 远洋
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Henry Story
• Re: WebID-ISSUE 66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] Henry Story
• Re: struggling with ASK Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Fediz IDP proposed for incubation at Apache Henry Story
• WebID-ISSUE-66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] WebID Incubator Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Limit public keys and SAN entries? (was Re: Updated IdP to new spec.) Andrei Sambra
• Re: Normative vs Informative Mo McRoberts
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Mo McRoberts
• dotnet implementation webid validation agent (doesnt work, yet) Peter Williams
• RE: Limit public keys and SAN entries? (was Re: Updated IdP to new spec.) Peter Williams
• struggling with ASK Peter Williams
• Fediz IDP proposed for incubation at Apache 远洋
• Limit public keys and SAN entries? (was Re: Updated IdP to new spec.) Stéphane Corlosquet
• RE: Updated IdP to new spec. Peter Williams
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• RE: Normative vs Informative Mo McRoberts

Monday, 28 November 2011

• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• RE: Updated IdP to new spec. Mo McRoberts
• RE: Normative vs Informative Mo McRoberts
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Andrei Sambra
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Mo McRoberts
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Mo McRoberts
• Re: Normative vs Informative Henry Story
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Henry Story
• RE: Normative vs Informative Peter Williams
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Henry Story
• Re: Apache configuration Sergio Fernández
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Andrei Sambra
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Henry Story
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Andrei Sambra
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Dan Brickley
• Re: Normative vs Informative Mo McRoberts
• Re: Normative vs Informative Manu Sporny

Sunday, 27 November 2011

• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Henry Story
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Andrei Sambra
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Henry Story
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] using windows to mint web id credentials, Henry Story
• Re: spec is good Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Normative vs Informative Mo McRoberts
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, Mo McRoberts
• RE: Updated IdP to new spec. Peter Williams
• RE: Normative vs Informative Peter Williams
• RE: using windows to mint web id credentials, Peter Williams
• Re: Normative vs Informative Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: Normative vs Informative Henry Story
• Re: Normative vs Informative Mo McRoberts
• Re: Normative vs Informative Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: Normative vs Informative Dominik Tomaszuk
• Updated IdP to new spec. Andrei Sambra
• spec is good Peter Williams
• Re: Normative vs Informative Henry Story
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Henry Story
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] Mo McRoberts

Saturday, 26 November 2011

• Re: foafssl.org converted - an example without SPARQL Henry Story
• foafssl.org converted - an example without SPARQL Henry Story
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, Kingsley Idehen
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, Mo McRoberts
• RE: using windows to mint web id credentials, Peter Williams
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, Kingsley Idehen
• using windows to mint web id credentials, Peter Williams
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Kingsley Idehen

Friday, 25 November 2011

• Verifying the WebID Claim Henry Story
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Stéphane Corlosquet
• RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Peter Williams
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Henry Story
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected Kingsley Idehen
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected Henry Story
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected Kingsley Idehen
• RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Peter Williams
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] Henry Story
• Dec 12th/13th TERENA euroCAMP in Utrecht elf Pavlik
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] Henry Story
• RE: WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] Peter Williams
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Henry Story
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Henry Story
• closed 9 issues Henry Story
• RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Peter Williams
• WebID-ISSUE-65 (attack_scenarios): Add an Attack Scenarios section to the spec [WebID Spec] WebID Incubator Group Issue Tracker
• WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] WebID Incubator Group Issue Tracker
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Dan Brickley
• Re: Apache configuration Sergio Fernández
• WebID-ISSUE-63 (wikier): Explain on the wiki how to configure WebID on Apache Tomcat [WebID wiki] WebID Incubator Group Issue Tracker
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Henry Story
• RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Peter Williams
• Re: Apache configuration Henry Story
• Re: Apache configuration Sergio Fernández
• Re: Apache configuration Henry Story
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mo McRoberts
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mischa Tuffield
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mo McRoberts
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mischa Tuffield
• Re: Apache configuration Henry Story
• how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? Peter Williams

Thursday, 24 November 2011

• Apache configuration bergi
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected Henry Story
• ask and you shall be redirected Peter Williams
• RE: new WebID spec published Peter Williams
• implementations -was: new WebID spec published Henry Story
• Re: new WebID spec published Henry Story
• FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 28 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Henry Story
• RE: new WebID spec published Peter Williams

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

• new WebID spec published Henry Story
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Henry Story
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mo McRoberts
• RE: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Peter Williams
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Henry Story
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Kingsley Idehen
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Henry Story
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mo McRoberts
• RE: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Peter Williams
• Re: cert ontology updated Henry Story
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Henry Story
• include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: cert ontology updated Kingsley Idehen
• RE: cert ontology updated Peter Williams
• Re: cert ontology updated Henry Story
• Re: cert ontology updated Henry Story
• Re: cert ontology updated Kingsley Idehen
• cert ontology updated Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Mo McRoberts
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Mischa Tuffield
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Mischa Tuffield
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Mo McRoberts
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Kingsley Idehen
• RE: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Peter Williams
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Mo McRoberts
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Mo McRoberts
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: updated spec with examples using new ontology Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Henry Story
• Re: updated spec with examples using new ontology Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Kingsley Idehen
• updated spec with examples using new ontology Henry Story
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Mo McRoberts
• different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Henry Story
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Nathan
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Henry Story
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Nathan

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote bergi
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Henry Story
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Henry Story
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Mo McRoberts
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:fingerprint ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Mo McRoberts
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mo McRoberts
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Henry Story
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Henry Story
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Mo McRoberts
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mo McRoberts
• Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:fingerprint ? Dan Brickley
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Melvin Carvalho
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? Mo McRoberts
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram Henry Story
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Henry Story
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mo McRoberts
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: rsa ontology (in cert namespace?) Henry Story
• RE: rsa ontology in cert namespace Mo McRoberts
• VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram Peter Williams

Monday, 21 November 2011

• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram Peter Williams
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram Henry Story
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Henry Story
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Sergio Fernández
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace Dominik Tomaszuk
• rsa ontology in cert namespace Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] CGI::Auth::FOAF_SSL 1.002 Henry Story
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Henry Story
• CGI::Auth::FOAF_SSL 1.002 Toby Inkster
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Jeff Sayre
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Andrei Sambra
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Kingsley Idehen
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Melvin Carvalho
• RE: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Mo McRoberts
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Nathan
• 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Henry Story
• Re: new spec in bblfish branch of mercurial repository Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: new spec in bblfish branch of mercurial repository Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram Peter Williams

Sunday, 20 November 2011

• Re: new spec in bblfish branch of mercurial repository Henry Story
• new spec in bblfish branch of mercurial repository Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram Sebastian Tramp
• Re: new sequence diagram Henry Story
• new sequence diagram Henry Story
• Re: WebID ISSUE 61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Henry Story
• Re: WebID ISSUE 61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Henry Story
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: WebID ISSUE 61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Henry Story
• Re: WebID ISSUE 61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Henry Story
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Dominik Tomaszuk

Saturday, 19 November 2011

• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Dominik Tomaszuk

Friday, 18 November 2011

• Re: LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook etc.. as WebID IdPs Kingsley Idehen
• Re: LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook etc.. as WebID IdPs Peter Williams
• LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook etc.. as WebID IdPs Kingsley Idehen
• Re: implementors first impression notes on the spec Kingsley Idehen
• Test suites added to mercurial Henry Story
• Re: implementors first impression notes on the spec Henry Story
• Re: implementors first impression notes on the spec Kingsley Idehen
• Terminology Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Terminology Kingsley Idehen
• FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC Henry Story
• Re: implementors first impression notes on the spec Henry Story
• WebID-ISSUE-62 (certificate_authorities): null certificate_authorities list WebID Incubator Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-33: Add a reference to the X.509 spec in the references sections Henry Story

Thursday, 17 November 2011

• Important Read on Internet Freedoms in the USA Jeff Sayre
• RE: henry and code Peter Williams
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Henry Story
• Re: henry and code Henry Story
• Re: henry and code Kingsley Idehen
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] bergi
• RE: implementors first impression notes on the spec Peter Williams
• implementors first impression notes on the spec Peter Williams
• RE: henry and code Peter Williams
• Re: henry and code Kingsley Idehen
• RE: henry and code Peter Williams
• henry and code Peter Williams

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Henry Story
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] bergi
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Melvin Carvalho
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Henry Story
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] Melvin Carvalho
• WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] WebID Incubator Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Melvin Carvalho
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Andrei Sambra
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Dominique Guardiola
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Kingsley Idehen
• xsd datattypes - was: Monday 14 November, Weekly meeting Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Kingsley Idehen

Monday, 14 November 2011

• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Kingsley Idehen
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Kingsley Idehen
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Melvin Carvalho
• RE: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Peter Williams
• Monday 14 November, Weekly meeting Henry Story
• Re: cert:hex was Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger Melvin Carvalho
• replaced cert:int with xsd:int Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Mischa Tuffield
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Kingsley Idehen
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Mischa Tuffield
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Mischa Tuffield
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Melvin Carvalho
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Baptiste Lafontaine
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Peter Williams

Sunday, 13 November 2011

• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Kingsley Idehen
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Henry Story
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Kingsley Idehen
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Kingsley Idehen
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Henry Story
• long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour Peter Williams

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

• RE: WebID TLS Peter Williams

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

• Re: [OT] How secure is HTTPS today? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [OT] How secure is HTTPS today? Henry Story
• Re: [OT] How secure is HTTPS today? Kingsley Idehen
• [OT] How secure is HTTPS today? Sergio Fernández
• Test Suite - Was: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture Henry Story
• Re: WebID TLS Henry Story

Monday, 7 November 2011

• Re: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture Henry Story
• Re: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture Jürgen Jakobitsch
• Re: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture Henry Story
• Re: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture Jürgen Jakobitsch
• Re: WebID TLS Peter Williams
• WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture Henry Story
• Re: close ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture Henry Story
• Re: WebID TLS Melvin Carvalho
• Re: WebID TLS Melvin Carvalho
• Re: WebID TLS Sergio Fernández

Sunday, 6 November 2011

• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Henry Story

Saturday, 5 November 2011

• Re: WebID TLS Stéphane Corlosquet

Sunday, 6 November 2011

• RE: WebID TLS Peter Williams
• Re: WebID TLS Henry Story
• Re: WebID TLS bergi
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods bergi

Saturday, 5 November 2011

• Another use case for DANE Henry Story
• Re: WebID TLS Dominik Tomaszuk
• Re: WebID TLS Andrei Sambra
• WebID TLS Henry Story
• Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Henry Story
• RE: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Peter Williams
• Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Joe Presbrey
• Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Mark Nottingham
• Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Peter Williams

Friday, 4 November 2011

• Re: [http-auth] Fwd: [TLS] HTTPS client-certificate-authentication in browsers, Peter Williams
• Re: [http-auth] Fwd: [TLS] HTTPS client-certificate-authentication in browsers, Henry Story
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 3 November 2011

• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Yutaka OIWA
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods bergi
• Re: cert:hex was Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger Melvin Carvalho
• Re: cert:hex was Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger Henry Story
• cert:hex was Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger Dominik Tomaszuk

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

• Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger Nathan
• TLS renegotiation in Java bug Henry Story
• Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger Melvin Carvalho
• Re: close ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture Jürgen Jakobitsch
• Fwd: Web Cryptography Working Group Charter Henry Story
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods Mark Nottingham

Monday, 31 October 2011

• Re: serialisation formats - Re: comments to references Dan Brickley

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 22:39:39 UTC