- From: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 11:28:53 +0200
- To: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
- CC: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 01.05.2011 02:13, bergi wrote: > I've found four things I would add/change in the document: > > Add an example in N3 to show how simple the ontology is. I will. It is in TODO list. > Add an URL to the RDF schema. Some people like the written words others > prefer machine readable formats ;-) It is also in TODO list. > The conclusion that the ontology is browser independent isn't really an > unique feature. Agree. > If it is you should go more into details (read/write as > simplified version of HTTP methods?). I used [2] vocabluary. > If you have already plans for access control for triples you could also > include this feature which makes it more interesting for other use cases. I think it will be future work. >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#sparqlTriplePatterns [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/ Regards, Dominik Tomaszuk
Received on Sunday, 1 May 2011 09:29:19 UTC