- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:41:55 +0100
- To: peter williams <home_pw@msn.com>
- Cc: "'WebID XG'" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 23 Mar 2011, at 17:59, peter williams wrote: > From a secure communications design standpoint, the design is flawed. It no > longer treats the client cert actually sent (optionally) in the TLS record > layer as a hint (which is its role), but as a mandatory control mechanism. > This forces information leakage, from channel, to cert, to validation > source. I don't understand you. DANE is about server certificates, not client certificates. > > The DANE text requires the validation agent to confirm that a message FROM > the client (the client cert in the client cert msg) confirms against the > hash/fingerprint thereof in the DNS RR. This makes the cert (a) mandatory > for presence on the wire, (b) mandatory for authenticity of the pubkey, (c) > vector for information leakage about who associates with who > (cryptographically). Its denies a tenet of RFC1422, that allows 2 CAs to > certify one pubkey (as a counterweight to political control over keys, and > facilitates DR and survivability) > > I hope they don't do this (but I suspect they will, for "national" crypto > political reasons). > > A military designers ensures the cert indicates to the cert discovery module > merely a hint - the requirement concerning how/where to look for evidence > for the public key. Should the cert discovery provider choose NOT to use > that cert but an alternative EE cert whose path that ends up authenticating > the same pubkey, SSL goes forward. SSL and cert discovery/closure are > ORTHOGONAL > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xg-webid-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-webid-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Henry Story > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:33 AM > To: WebID XG > Subject: self-signed certificates in DANE > > Dane has a section now on self-signed certificates > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-protocol-06#section-2.3 > > I think it is going in the direction we would like: to make it easy for web > sites to create self signed certs for their services. But I am not sure. > > Henry > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:42:34 UTC